that will make the whole table 840 pixels then just adjust it to what ever size you need ... maybe 560 or 640 ...ect ..... ect
Hope this helps :)"
theHostingFinder said: "Yes, I'd need to see the context of the problem to help, really. Tables are the classical way of positioning content, and I still find them useful. I have not been able to find a way of centering the content part of my webpages, at every user screen resolution, using CSS. Using tables, it's easy. Right now I use a mixture of tables and CSS sheets to build my web sites (example below) - kind of using the best of both worlds.
--------------
Hosting reviews: [url]http://www.thehostingfinder.com[/url]"
silatpupil said: "Tables are notoriously bad for layout design.....
As Edwin suggested, try css, its actually very simple, and its a lot better for site design."
<h1> said: "if you are building sites that don't change like yours.
How are you able to postion elements when the contents are unknown? It's just like solving a problem but creating another. For small simple sites that won't change much div positioning is obviously suggested.
Check my site: I coded it in 3 days...all tables very confusing yes a lot of code. But when I want to add anything the table design shifts and keeps the same general design. I don't have to now change the positioning of other elements to fit with the new content.
[url]www.richardwdesigns.com[/url]"
theHostingFinder said: "You have a point there. Tables may act like sort of rubber bands, that hold the content.... But you can design DIV:s in CSS to be sort of flexible, too. What may lead to problems is that everything has a fixed upper-left-corner position, if you do orthodox CSS.
Personally, I prefer using a mixture of old + new.
---------------------------------
[url="http://www.thehostingfinder.com"]Serious cheap web hosting reviews[/url]"